Zero-Knowledge Proofs in E-Signatures: Privacy Meets Security
How zero-knowledge cryptography enables completely private e-signatures. Prove you signed without revealing your identity or document contents.
Dr. James Chen
Cryptography Lead
Zero-Knowledge Proofs in E-Signatures: Privacy Meets Security
What if you could prove you signed a document without revealing who you are, what you signed, or when you signed it—while maintaining complete legal validity? Zero-knowledge proofs make this possible.
What Are Zero-Knowledge Proofs?
A zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) is a cryptographic method where one party (the prover) can prove to another party (the verifier) that a statement is true, without revealing any information beyond the validity of the statement itself.
The Classic Example: Ali Baba's Cave
Imagine a circular cave with a magic door that opens only if you know the secret password.
Challenge: Prove you know the password without revealing it.
Solution:
1. You enter the cave and choose path A or B
2. Verifier waits outside
3. Verifier randomly shouts "Come out path A!" or "Come out path B!"
4. If you know the password, you can always exit the requested path
5. Repeat 20 times—if you succeed every time, you proved you know the password
6. But verifier learned nothing about the password itself
Probability of faking: (1/2)^20 = 0.0001% (essentially impossible)
Zero-Knowledge Proofs for E-Signatures
Traditional E-Signature Disclosure
What's Revealed:
Privacy Concerns:
Zero-Knowledge E-Signature
What's Proven:
What's Hidden:
Real-World Use Cases
1. Whistleblower Document Submission
Scenario: Employee needs to submit signed affidavit to authorities without revealing identity (yet).
Traditional: Risky—metadata could expose whistleblower before protection is granted.
With ZK-Proofs:
```javascript
const signature = await client.signatures.createZeroKnowledge({
document: affidavit,
proof: {
statement: "Signer is current employee with access to relevant records",
reveal: false // Identity hidden until legal protection granted
}
});
// Later, after protection is granted
await signature.revealIdentity({
authorizedParty: 'SEC Investigation #12345',
proofOfProtection: whistleblowerProtectionOrder
});
```
2. Healthcare Research Consent
Scenario: Patient consents to research study but wants maximum privacy.
Requirements:
Implementation:
```javascript
const consent = await client.signatures.createZeroKnowledge({
document: researchConsent,
proof: {
claims: [
{ property: 'age', proof: 'greaterThan', value: 18 },
{ property: 'diagnosis', proof: 'equals', value: 'ICD-10-X' },
{ property: 'capacity', proof: 'true' }
],
revealIdentity: false,
trustedVerifier: 'IRB-123@hospital.edu'
}
});
// Researchers see only:
// "Valid consent from eligible patient - Verified by IRB"
```
3. Government Contract Bidding
Scenario: Sealed bid procurement where bidders submit proposals.
Requirements:
ZK Approach:
```javascript
// Submit sealed bid
const bid = await client.signatures.createZeroKnowledge({
document: proposal,
proof: {
commitment: hash(bidAmount + randomNonce),
timestamp: {
before: deadline,
proof: 'range' // Prove time is in valid range
},
revealTime: deadline + (24 60 60 1000) // 24 hours after
}
});
// After deadline, all bidders reveal simultaneously
await bid.reveal({
value: bidAmount,
nonce: randomNonce
});
// Verifier confirms: hash(bidAmount + nonce) === original commitment
```
4. Anonymous Shareholder Voting
Scenario: Corporate governance vote where shareholders want privacy.
Requirements:
Solution:
```javascript
const vote = await client.signatures.createZeroKnowledge({
document: proxyVote,
proof: {
membership: {
set: 'authorized_shareholders',
uniqueness: true // Prevent double-voting
},
choice: voteChoice, // Encrypted
weight: shareCount // Encrypted
}
});
// Voting tallied without revealing individual choices
// Only final result disclosed
```
Technical Implementation
zk-SNARKs for E-Signatures
zk-SNARK = Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge
Properties:
- Zero-Knowledge: Reveals nothing beyond validity
- Succinct: Proofs are small (few hundred bytes)
- Non-Interactive: No back-and-forth required
- Argument: Computationally sound (can't fake with current tech)
Basic Flow:
```javascript
// 1. Generate proving and verification keys (one-time setup)
const { provingKey, verifyingKey } = await zkSnark.setup({
circuit: 'signature-validity'
});
// 2. Create proof
const proof = await zkSnark.prove({
provingKey,
publicInputs: [documentHash],
privateInputs: [signatureKey, timestamp, metadata]
});
// 3. Verify proof
const isValid = await zkSnark.verify({
verifyingKey,
proof,
publicInputs: [documentHash]
});
// Returns true/false without learning privateInputs
```
Commitment Schemes
Use Case: Prove you signed at specific time without revealing exact timestamp.
```javascript
// Commit to signature at time T
const commitment = await crypto.commit({
value: {
signature: signatureBytes,
timestamp: Date.now(),
documentHash: hash(document)
},
nonce: randomBytes(32)
});
// Publish commitment hash
await blockchain.publish(commitment.hash);
// Later, reveal commitment
await commitment.reveal({
authorizedParty: verifier,
proof: commitment.proof
});
```
Merkle Tree Proofs
Use Case: Prove signature is in set of valid signatures without revealing which one.
```javascript
// Build Merkle tree of all valid signers
const tree = new MerkleTree([
hash(signer1PubKey),
hash(signer2PubKey),
// ... 1000 more signers
hash(signerNPubKey)
]);
// Prove your signature is from valid signer
const proof = tree.getProof(hash(myPubKey));
// Verifier confirms membership without knowing which signer
const isValid = tree.verify(proof, tree.root);
// true, but doesn't reveal position in tree
```
Privacy vs. Auditability
The Challenge
How do you maintain privacy while enabling regulatory compliance and dispute resolution?
Selective Disclosure
Concept: Hide everything by default, reveal only what's necessary when necessary.
```javascript
const signature = await client.signatures.create({
document: contract,
privacy: {
default: 'hidden',
disclosureRules: [
{
condition: 'court_order',
reveal: ['signer_identity', 'timestamp'],
keep_hidden: ['document_content']
},
{
condition: 'audit_request',
reveal: ['timestamp', 'ip_address'],
keep_hidden: ['signer_identity', 'document_content']
},
{
condition: 'counterparty_request',
reveal: ['signature_validity', 'timestamp_range'],
keep_hidden: ['exact_timestamp', 'signer_identity']
}
]
}
});
```
Trusted Escrow
Scenario: Identity hidden from public but held in escrow for emergencies.
```javascript
const signature = await client.signatures.createWithEscrow({
document: sensitiveDoc,
signer: {
identity: myIdentity,
revealTo: 'escrow_agent_public_key'
},
escrowConditions: {
releaseOn: [
'legal_subpoena',
'fraud_investigation',
'unanimous_board_vote'
],
requireMultiSig: 3 // Need 3 of 5 escrow key holders
}
});
```
Legal Validity of ZK Signatures
E-SIGN Act Compliance
Requirements:
1. ✅ Intent to sign — Proven cryptographically
2. ✅ Consent to electronic transaction — Explicit opt-in
3. ✅ Association with record — Cryptographic binding
4. ✅ Record retention — Encrypted storage with ZK proofs
The Catch: Identity verification requirements may conflict with full anonymity in some jurisdictions.
Solution: Tiered disclosure levels.
eIDAS Qualified Signatures with Privacy
Challenge: eIDAS qualified signatures require identity certificates.
ZK Approach:
```javascript
// Prove you have valid eIDAS certificate without revealing identity
const proof = await zkSnark.prove({
statement: "I possess valid qualified certificate from EU QTSP",
publicInputs: [
certificationAuthorityPublicKey,
validityPeriodMerkleRoot
],
privateInputs: [
myCertificate,
myPrivateKey,
certificateProof
]
});
// Verifier confirms: "Valid QES from authorized holder"
// Doesn't learn: Who the holder is
```
Performance Considerations
Computational Cost
Traditional Signature:
ZK-SNARK Signature:
Optimization: Pre-compute proving keys for common circuits.
Proof Size
Traditional Signature: 64-256 bytes (depending on algorithm)
ZK-SNARK Proof: 200-300 bytes
Benefit: Still small enough for blockchain anchoring.
Blockchain Integration
Use Case: Immutable timestamp proof with privacy.
```javascript
// Generate ZK proof
const proof = await generateSignatureProof({
signature: mySignature,
document: documentHash,
timestamp: Date.now()
});
// Anchor proof to blockchain (public)
const tx = await ethereum.publishProof({
proofHash: hash(proof),
metadata: {
statement: "Valid signature created within 5 minutes of timestamp",
revealNone: true
}
});
// Anyone can verify proof is anchored
// Nobody learns who signed or what was signed
```
Building ZK E-Signature Systems
Architecture
```
┌─────────────┐
│ Client │
│ (Browser) │
└──────┬──────┘
│ 1. Sign document locally
│ 2. Generate ZK proof
▼
┌─────────────┐
│ ZK Prover │ ← Runs in browser or secure enclave
│ Service │
└──────┬──────┘
│ 3. Submit proof (not signature)
▼
┌─────────────┐
│ Platform │
│ Storage │ ← Stores encrypted doc + proof
└──────┬──────┘
│ 4. Publish proof hash
▼
┌─────────────┐
│ Blockchain │ ← Immutable timestamp
│ Anchor │
└─────────────┘
```
Security Best Practices
1. Trusted Setup Ceremony
For zk-SNARKs requiring trusted setup:
```bash
Multi-party computation ceremony
100+ participants worldwide
Even if 99 are malicious, 1 honest participant ensures security
npx zk-ceremony participate --circuit signature-circuit
```
2. Secure Randomness
```javascript
// Use cryptographically secure randomness for nonces
const nonce = await crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(32));
// NEVER use Math.random() for commitments
// ❌ const badNonce = Math.random(); // Predictable!
```
3. Proof Verification
```javascript
// Always verify proofs before accepting
async function acceptSignature(proof) {
// 1. Verify ZK proof is valid
if (!await zkSnark.verify(proof)) {
throw new Error('Invalid ZK proof');
}
// 2. Check proof is for correct circuit
if (proof.circuitId !== EXPECTED_CIRCUIT) {
throw new Error('Wrong circuit');
}
// 3. Verify blockchain anchor
if (!await blockchain.verifyAnchor(proof.hash)) {
throw new Error('Proof not anchored');
}
// 4. Check timestamp is within acceptable range
if (!isTimestampValid(proof.timestampProof)) {
throw new Error('Invalid timestamp');
}
// All checks pass
return true;
}
```
The Future: ZK-Everything
Programmable Privacy
Vision: Define precisely what to reveal to whom, when.
```javascript
const contract = await client.contracts.create({
privacyPolicy: {
counterparty: {
reveal: ['my_company_name', 'authorized_signatory'],
hide: ['individual_signer', 'internal_approval_chain']
},
auditor: {
reveal: ['timestamp_range', 'compliance_status'],
hide: ['signer_identity', 'exact_terms']
},
public: {
reveal: ['contract_exists', 'is_valid'],
hide: ['everything_else']
}
}
});
```
Cross-Chain ZK Signatures
Use Case: Prove signature on Ethereum valid for Polygon transaction.
```javascript
// Sign on Ethereum
const ethProof = await ethereum.signWithProof(document);
// Use same proof on Polygon without revealing private key
await polygon.verifyAndExecute({
proof: ethProof,
action: 'transfer_ownership'
});
```
Conclusion
Zero-knowledge proofs revolutionize e-signature privacy:
Benefits:
Trade-offs:
As privacy regulations tighten worldwide, zero-knowledge e-signatures transform from cutting-edge research to business necessity.
Want to explore ZK signatures for your use case? [Contact our crypto team](/request-a-demo)
Ready to Try Space Sign?
Experience the power of open-source, AI-powered e-signatures.
